Ethics from an economic perspective

Ethics from an economic perspective !!

The exchange of money is the greatest social phenomenon in economic civilizations.

The ease of conducting various types of exchanges with money has resulted in the introduction of all societies where the division of labor is the basis for the organization of production.

Money Before it was often the subject of greed, and before it always became a means of living, criticism was only a tool within an advanced exchange technique. It is the common denominator of all caretaker, and it makes monetary returns the source of every economic power. As such, the control tool is at the heart of the exchange tool.

The importance of the idea of money and its subject matter in ideas and in minds compels us to look at its place in practical ethics. Indeed, both good and evil have found criticism in a field and a sin of conflict. This is obvious, as long as the bulk of the exchanges are achieved in monetary form, and as long as the exchange keeps pace with the whole economic life, which is the outcome of all the works, all projects, and all inventions.

The importance of ethical ideas is evident when we perceive money as a sign and a means of acquiring wealth. It is the familiar area of "money", and the scapegoat for all the flaws of economic systems based on individual enrichment.

People talk about money that is corrupt, which causes damage to the heart and soul. Yes, an individual who becomes rich often enjoys the well-being of money, and then often forgets his misery.

What is raised about the great wealth is that it always allows one individual to control a large number, control not directly aimed at the well-being of followers but rather to enrich the Mr. Nevertheless, a corresponding moral situation is also a common feature that we sometimes encounter among those who themselves recognize the disadvantages of scarcity.

In their view, money is a personalized reference to work and its products. In precise words, money, because it is from work, is a good thing.

Money, a value transfer tool, is the method that allows man to imagine the future and to see beyond his day and beyond his generation, with the legacy he leaves to his children.

Money is a means of social progress based on work and is a daily tool for raising and preserving value, and it is to achieve human engagement in time, and it offers him the reward of his efforts, and also gives him meaning Duties.

Thus, money in social life introduces the idea of honesty in the performance of duty.

These two opposing aspects of moral judgment over money have been received by almost every one of us.

The ethics of social prudence and caution offer the virtue of saving the best foundations.

Savings are the act of narrowing current consumption to increase the savings share to cope with emergencies and future conditions.

It is certainly welcome to manage the improvement of the conditions of the existence of family and children through work and availability. However, we may sometimes exaggerate when we consider the virtuous feature of the virtue of saving. Not all savings patterns are equally virtuous. The one that reaches the point of stinginess is a pattern that is well-placed, as is the pattern of scarcity and holding of the hand.

It is our duty to think about the habits of the lifestyle that make saving easy for some people,

It is difficult to define the status of saving as a virtue between greed and dissipation, it is a middle virtue, and it is not possible to determine the status of generosity and the extreme.

One of the qualities of money that researchers acknowledge is that it gives the individual a strong sense of duties. There is a complete morality revolving around the fulfillment of contracts and economic and financial honesty.

Some people may think that moral feelings have nothing to starve in economic behavior.

Nevertheless, these feelings play a role, but the extent of this role varies according to the circumstances and times. If there is no abundance in a specific sector of consumption, we should take into account people's tendency to compete for scarce goods.

Economic doctrine can continue to create itself steadily, interpreting new realities and guiding opinion according to the fundamental objectives and ethical habits of societies.

The overwhelming gap between deeds and words often irritates us and our sense of dignity.

Perhaps the greatest evil severs around the green tables at international conferences.

Experts gathered to look for solutions to economic problems, and to seek trade and business, calculate that they are forced to make the familiar declaration of the advantages of free trade between nations, while carrying in their bags The strict order to strangle her?!

We seem to be used to showing off which, as we know, is the salutation of virtue by vice.

Moral judgment is only evident in some particularly obvious cases: the seller who monopolizes a commodity, because it expects its price to rise soon, is making immoral speculation. A trader who benefits from the war and embezzles an imaginary price for some of the essential goods is committing an anti-social and immoral act, and there are finally circumstances in which the economic situation is so severe that every A seller who finds himself vulnerable to the temptation to use it to exploit customers.

The situation has changed for a large number of business practices, which are also only the exploitation of a situation. In such cases, morality remains incapable of fighting evil at times because everything that is going on in the corridors has been hidden, and sometimes because no one even understands it that is responsible for it.

In conclusion, we are required to return to the issues of Ethics and caretaker in our economic life and financial dealings before we are victims of greed, selfishness and exploitation?! .